2024-04-05 12:04:05
Click:
Gabion mesh is an upgraded version of stone cage mesh. The core difference between the two lies in the weaving process, which leads to a series of differences such as strength and applicable scenarios. Gabion mesh is more focused on the high-strength requirements of medium and large-scale projects.
I. Core Difference: Weaving Technique
The weaving process is the most essential difference between the two, which directly determines the structural stability and strength.
High-strength Gabion mesh: It adopts a five-twist process, that is, each transverse wire is cross-wound with the longitudinal wire five times. This process makes the mesh more closely combined, with a mesh deformation rate of ≤5% and less prone to loosening.

Gabion mesh: It mostly adopts the double-twisted process, and the wires are only cross-wound twice. The mesh connection is relatively loose, and the deformation rate is relatively high (about 10%-15%) when subjected to external force.

Ii. Differences in Materials and Specifications
Due to the differences in process and application, there are obvious distinctions in the standards of wire and filling materials between the two, as shown in the following table:
| Comparison dimension | High- strength Gabion mesh | Gabion mesh |
| Wire diameter | 2.0-4.0mm (thicker, high-strength low-carbon steel wire) | 1.5-3.0mm (Thinner, common low-carbon steel wire) |
| Anti-corrosion standard | The thickness of the zinc coating is ≥100μm (hot-dip galvanized), and the thickness of the plastic coating is ≥1.0mm | The thickness of the zinc coating is ≥85μm (hot-dip galvanizing), and the thickness of the plastic coating is ≥0.8mm |
| Mesh size | 60×80mm, 80×100mm (uniform mesh, not easy to deform) | 50×70mm, 70×90mm (The mesh is prone to slight deformation) |
| Requirements for filling stones | Particle size: 15-35cm, compressive strength: ≥50MPa, single piece: ≥25kg | Particle size: 10-30cm, compressive strength: ≥30MPa, single piece: ≥15kg |
Iii. Structural and Dimensional Differences
Hight-strength Gabion mesh:
Cage: Height 0.8-2.0 meters, length 2-6 meters, width 1-3 meters. Larger in size, it can be stacked in multiple layers for high retaining walls, DAMS, etc.
Net pad: Height ≤0.5m, area 3-6㎡, suitable for high slope protection.

Gabion mesh:
Cage: Height 0.5-1.5 meters, length 1-6 meters, width 1-2 meters. It is relatively small in size and mainly focuses on small-scale projects.
Net pad: Height ≤0.3m, area 2-4㎡, suitable for gentle slopes or ecological grass planting.

Iv. Differences in Applicable Scenarios
Hight-strength Gabion mesh: Focusing on medium and large-scale high-intensity projects, its core is to meet the demands of 'strong impact and high load-bearing capacity'.
Water conservancy projects: Reinforcement of large DAMS, protection of banks in rapid rivers, and anti-scouring of bridge piers.
Traffic engineering: Protection of high slopes on expressways, reinforcement of railway subgrades (high fill sections).
Special engineering: Protective structures for highly corrosive environments (coastal areas, chemical industrial zones).
Gabion mesh: Focusing on small-scale projects or ecological scenarios, its core response is to the demands of 'low cost and ecological integration'.
Water conservancy projects: small-scale river bank protection, rural embankment protection, and temporary flood control water blocking.
Ecological engineering: Mountain greening (low slopes), small revetments in wetland parks, and light restoration of mines.
Municipal engineering: Residential area landscape retaining walls (height < 3m), urban small river management.
V. Core Performance Differences
| Performance dimension | Hight-strength Gabion mesh | Gabion mesh |
| Tensile strength | High (over 30% higher than gabion mesh) | Medium (meeting the demands of small-scale projects) |
| Anti-deformation ability | Strong (The mesh is not easy to loosen and is suitable for large settlement) | Medium (slightly deformable, suitable for small settlement) |
| Service life | Long (20 to 40 years in complex environments) | Medium (5 to 30 years in a normal environment) |
| Engineering cost | Relatively high (thick wire, complex process | Lower (thin wire, simple process) |
SUPPORT